tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3887802820654018134.post1825951867745897830..comments2023-10-16T10:20:28.730-05:00Comments on Cripes! Get back to fundamentals...: Michigan Fire Zonebrophyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01533102260799641755noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3887802820654018134.post-58289963612787582892010-02-25T16:04:36.999-06:002010-02-25T16:04:36.999-06:00This is from Scott Shafer's playbook, correct?...This is from Scott Shafer's playbook, correct?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3887802820654018134.post-57051290052380757992010-02-24T08:34:42.585-06:002010-02-24T08:34:42.585-06:00Yes - #3 can pose an issue, whether it be by flare...Yes - #3 can pose an issue, whether it be by flare or by trips. However, since this is all pattern-match, the #3 player matches to #3, and would essentially jump #3 man-to-man. As a flare, this is handled anyway as the (shallow) hole player flowing with back.brophyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01533102260799641755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3887802820654018134.post-25316176331075329502010-02-24T02:54:00.275-06:002010-02-24T02:54:00.275-06:00Sting leaves the question who takes SCAT, #3 flare...Sting leaves the question who takes SCAT, #3 flare/ or QB roll into Flood, especially the FB flat pass, with #2 above and #1 running clear with take-off or post. Maybe this is a boundary call, since they have a double F-Zone happening and give Corners Underneath #1 responsibilities too. But hey I am in Germany and they are in Michigan and the only semblance of connection is I run F-Zones too and we both have a Latin last name. If I got a 10th of Coach RR, opps! we also share initials...salary I would be one happy guy.CRLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3887802820654018134.post-7588704881615477912010-02-23T18:44:24.491-06:002010-02-23T18:44:24.491-06:00I might be missing this, but on BARK, who is accou...I might be missing this, but on BARK, who is accounting for TE side B gap. I know you mention that Mac will blitz AT the B gap but is shown C. I assume flow of back takes him to B? If not, is $ taking B along with Will?<br />Thanks for the post. Hoping to adapt some similar ideas into our defense.Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09482969203999985290noreply@blogger.com